Published on :
PCB cleaning is the process of removing flux residue, ionic contamination, solder balls, oils, and other contaminants remaining on a printed circuit board after soldering in order to help maintain the quality and reliability of electronic equipment.
Are PCB cleaning and flux cleaning different? The terms are often used almost interchangeably, but PCB cleaning can cover not only flux residue but also fingerprints, oils, dust, and various contaminants introduced during manufacturing.
As explained on our What Is Soldering Flux? page, soldering flux plays an important role in improving soldering quality.
However, flux components remaining after soldering can affect product reliability under certain conditions. Flux cleaning is therefore an effective way to prevent or address problems associated with flux residue.
This page explains why flux is cleaned, representative PCB and flux cleaning systems, how to improve cleaning performance, and how to evaluate cleanliness after cleaning.
What problems can occur if flux residue is not removed?
The primary purpose of flux cleaning is to help prevent electrical and physical problems such as the following.
![]() |
Reduced Insulation Reliability |
|
Corrosion |
|
|
Connection Failures |
|
|
Leakage or Short Circuits Caused by Residual Solder Balls |
|
Other potential problems include:
|
|
No-clean fluxes are widely used today, which can lead to the question: “Is PCB cleaning still necessary?”
However, cleaning may still be required in high-reliability applications such as automotive electronics, medical devices, communication equipment, and industrial electronics. Even small amounts of flux residue or ionic contamination can affect insulation performance, corrosion resistance, or migration behavior depending on the design and operating environment.
Cleaning may also be required when downstream processes such as wire bonding, conformal coating, or underfill application depend on clean surfaces for reliable bonding and adhesion.
The need for cleaning should therefore be determined not only by the type of flux but also by product application, downstream processes, operating environment, and required reliability.
| Application | Typical Requirements |
|---|---|
| Automotive Electronics | Long-term reliability and resistance to demanding temperature environments |
| Medical Devices | High reliability and prevention of functional failures |
| Communication Equipment | Stable signal performance and insulation reliability |
| Industrial Equipment | Long service life and maintainability |
For these applications, PCB cleaning is not simply intended to improve appearance. It can be an important process for supporting the quality and reliability of electronic assemblies.
Evaluating a PCB cleaning system solely by cleaning power can create operational problems later. Cleaning-agent cost, drying time, equipment safety measures, waste-liquid treatment, material compatibility, and running costs should also be considered.
As assembly density increases and environmental requirements evolve, cleaning processes are increasingly evaluated as complete systems, including cleaning, rinsing, and drying, rather than by cleaning chemistry alone. Important considerations include cleaning performance, environmental impact, stable drying, process control, and component compatibility.
KAKEN TECH designs and develops both cleaning agents and cleaning equipment, enabling us to propose complete cleaning processes instead of cleaning chemicals alone. Through cleaning tests and evaluation, we can propose cleaning conditions suited to your PCBs and manufacturing requirements.
When selecting a flux cleaning method, it is important to consider not only flux removability but also environmental impact, safety, operator workload such as bath replacement and waste treatment, and running costs.
The table below compares representative flux cleaning systems.
| Item | Water-Containing Alcohol System | Semi-Aqueous System | Hydrocarbon System | Brominated / Fluorinated Solvent System |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-Free Flux Compatibility | ◎ | 〇 | △ | △ |
| Ionic Residue Removal |
◎ | 〇 | △ | △ |
| Drying Performance | 〇 | △ | △ | ◎ |
| Wastewater | None | None* | Generated* | None |
| Safety | 〇 | ◎ | △ | ◎ |
| Running Cost |
◎ | × | 〇 | △ |
*Actual wastewater generation and treatment requirements depend on the specific equipment and process configuration. Confirm local environmental, safety, and waste-disposal requirements before selecting a system.

| Cleaning | High-boiling glycol ether-based cleaner |
|---|---|
| Rinsing | Water-containing alcohol rinse |
| Drying | Drying performance comparable to IPA |
Water-containing alcohol flux cleaning systems combine high cleaning performance with relatively fast drying and are used for high-density PCB assemblies and applications requiring high cleanliness. A glycol ether-based cleaner removes rosin and other flux components, while the water-containing alcohol rinse helps remove ionic contamination and residual cleaning-agent components.
Compared with systems that use a pure-water rinse, shorter drying times can be achieved more easily. In KAKEN TECH's closed-process design, the rinse agent can be regenerated and circulated within the equipment, helping reduce wastewater generation. Appropriate process design combining the cleaner, equipment, and rinse agent supports stable PCB cleanliness and product quality.
Example System

| Cleaning | Cleaner containing solvents such as glycol ethers, surfactants, and water |
|---|---|
| Rinsing | Purified water |
| Drying | Hot-air drying; generally slower than IPA-based drying |
Semi-aqueous systems can offer good handling characteristics depending on the formulation. When the cleaning agent contains water, concentration and water content may require process control. As contamination accumulates and bath composition changes, redeposition can occur. Water-rinse processes can also generate wastewater and may require appropriate wastewater treatment.
Example System

| Cleaning | Hydrocarbon cleaner |
|---|---|
| Rinsing | Clean solvent or solvent vapor |
| Drying | Vacuum or reduced-pressure drying may be used |
Hydrocarbon cleaners generally dissolve resinous flux components such as rosin effectively, but their ability to remove ionic contamination can be limited. Depending on the formulation and operating conditions, flammability controls and equipment safeguards may be required. Compatibility with plastics, elastomers, adhesives, and mounted components should also be evaluated before use.
Example System

| Cleaning | Brominated or fluorinated solvent cleaner |
|---|---|
| Rinsing | Clean solvent vapor |
| Drying | Natural evaporation / vapor-process drying |
These solvent systems have been used for degreasing and certain flux-cleaning applications and can offer excellent drying characteristics. Their cleaning performance for modern lead-free flux residues varies with chemistry and process conditions. Because some solvent chemistries have environmental, health, or regulatory considerations, applicable local requirements and the latest SDS should be reviewed when evaluating these systems.
PCB cleaning targets more than flux residue. Various contaminants can be introduced during manufacturing and storage, so cleaning chemistry and process selection should reflect the type of contamination present.
| Contaminant | Typical Source | Potential Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Flux Residue | Soldering Process | Insulation or adhesion problems |
| Activator Components / Ionic Contamination | Flux Components / Manufacturing Environment | Migration or corrosion |
| Solder Balls | Printing / Reflow Process | Leakage or short circuits |
| Unreacted Flux Components | Heating Conditions / Flux Type | Coating or bonding problems |
| Oils / Fingerprints | Operator Handling | Coating adhesion problems |
| Dust / Foreign Matter | Manufacturing / Storage Environment | Contact problems |
The optimum cleaning system depends on the contamination involved. It is important to characterize the contamination and select the cleaning chemistry and equipment as an integrated process.
The optimum method also depends on PCB structure, mounted components, subsequent processes, and required reliability.
Because KAKEN TECH designs and develops both cleaning agents and cleaning equipment, we can propose complete cleaning processes based on the residues to be removed and the required cleanliness level.
Through cleaning tests and evaluation, we support the selection of cleaning agents, equipment, and process conditions suited to each PCB and manufacturing process.
PCB cleaning does not end when the cleaning cycle is complete. It is important to confirm that the required cleanliness level has actually been achieved.
| Evaluation Method | What It Evaluates |
|---|---|
| Visual Inspection | Presence of visible flux residue or foreign matter |
| Ionic Contamination Measurement | Amount of residual ionic contamination |
| Insulation Resistance Testing | Electrical reliability |
| Surface Analysis | Composition of residual material |
For high-reliability applications, quantitative evaluation may be appropriate even when contamination is not visible.
For more information, see Methods for Evaluating Cleaning Performance After Flux Cleaning.
Cleaning efficiency can be improved by combining the dissolving power of the cleaning agent with appropriate physical action. Many flux cleaning systems use one or more of the following methods.
| Cleaning Method |
Immersion | Agitation / Rotation |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid Circulation / Jet Flow / Boiling | ||
| Ultrasonic | ||
| Bubbling | ||
| Spray Cleaning | ||
| Vapor Cleaning | ||
| Brushing | ||
| Other Methods | ||
The workpiece is immersed in cleaning solution so that flux residue can be dissolved by the cleaning agent. Because simply soaking the workpiece does not always promote sufficient diffusion of dissolved contamination, immersion cleaning is often combined with physical action such as the following.
Jet Flow
Cleaning solution circulated by a pump is directed toward workpieces while they are immersed. This can provide relatively uniform cleaning throughout the tank, and turbulent flow can promote removal and dispersion of dissolved contamination.
Ultrasonic Cleaning
Ultrasonic energy is transmitted through the cleaning liquid, and cavitation and acceleration effects help remove contamination. It can be particularly effective for removing solder balls and contamination from fine features. Some components may be sensitive to ultrasonic energy, so frequency, power, exposure time, and component compatibility should be evaluated.
Cleaning solution is sprayed onto the workpiece in a shower-like pattern.
Advantages include applicability to many cleaning chemistries and the ability to increase mechanical cleaning action by adjusting spray pressure. However, highly volatile or flammable cleaning agents may require enclosed equipment, ventilation, vapor control, and other safety measures. Excessive spray pressure can damage sensitive assemblies, atomized cleaner can increase solvent loss, and shadowed areas that are not reached effectively by the spray may be more difficult to clean.
Always confirm the cleaner's SDS, equipment compatibility, and local requirements before use.
For small quantities or localized cleaning after repair, handheld flux-cleaning sprays may also be used. These products are commonly marketed as “flux cleaning spray,” “flux remover,” or “flux cleaner.” The terminology differs, but the basic purpose is to remove flux contamination.
Cleaning-agent vapor condenses on the workpiece, and the condensed liquid dissolves contamination as it flows from the surface. Vapor cleaning can be used with compatible solvent systems and equipment designed for the selected chemistry. Depending on the solvent, vacuum or closed-system operation may also be used.
The surface of the workpiece is physically scrubbed with a brush, pad, or similar tool to remove contamination.
Brushing provides strong mechanical action but can damage the substrate and may create secondary contamination from shed fibers or abrasion debris. It also cannot effectively reach areas where the tool cannot physically contact the surface, such as fine gaps and spaces under components.
Standard Microsoldering Technology, 3rd Edition
Edited by the Microsoldering Education Committee, Japan Welding Engineering Society
Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Ltd.
![]() |
Technical Solutions
|
|---|---|
![]() |
Technical Solutions
|
![]() |
Product Information
|
![]() |
Product Information
|
![]() |
Product Information
|
![]() |
Product Information
|
| Please be as specific as possible in your inquiry. Depending on the contents of your inquiry, it may take some time for us to reply to you. If you need product documentation (SDS/safety data sheets, TDS, instruction manuals, etc.), please contact us via “Request for SDS and other product documentation” ※Sales message through the inquiry form are strictly prohibited. |
KAKEN TECH, MICROCLEANER, MICROCLEAN&MARKLESS and MARKLESS are trademarks of KAKEN TECH CO., LTD. in PRC.
KAKEN TECH is a trademark of KAKEN TECH CO., LTD. in the U.S..